This is the time to observe (not trade) how coins react to bullish news. If it full retraces their news and go lower, aka hellslide, it says alot about the current state of market.

1: Chain TVL flows. 2: Stablecoin flows. 3: Protocol TVL flows. 4: Investigate. CYI does it the best, locked tf in.

So... top holder of $TROLL is also the top holder of OG $WOJAK 😈 good traders knows what is right

Over the next 6 months, you will be given the chance to lock in a new financial level, permanently. Don’t fumble reaching for more. Secure the level. Then expand.

when are we finally gonna stop doing this clown shit

Knowing When You’re Wrong (Simple Trade Invalidation) One of the most overlooked skills in trading is knowing when a trade is no longer valid. Not just when to stop out but when the core idea behind the trade has broken down. There are a few ways to think about invalidation: 1. Price-Based Invalidation You enter with a thesis and there’s a price level that, if reached, clearly proves that thesis wrong. It could be a break of structure, loss of key support, or failure to hold after a catalyst. Whatever the case, there’s a line where you say: "If it hits here, I’m out. The trade didn’t work." The mistake is treating stops as optional. A proper price-based invalidation is part of the setup not something you react to emotionally. --- 2. Time-Based Invalidation Not every failed trade ends in a sharp move against you. Sometimes, it’s the lack of movement that tells you something’s off. If you expected momentum or fast follow-through and the trade just goes flat, that’s a form of failure too. It suggests the bid you anticipated isn’t there. Time-based invalidation protects you from passively sitting in dead trades while better opportunities pass you by. If the trade was meant to move quickly, and it didn’t that’s enough of a reason to reassess. --- 3. Context-Based Invalidation This one’s more subtle but often more important. Sometimes price hasn’t moved much, and you’re still technically “in range,” but the environment has changed. Maybe majors reversed sharply. Maybe the narrative faded. Maybe the catalyst dropped and no one cared. Maybe a macro piece of news changed the market risk tolerance. In these cases, the trade may not be invalid by chart structure, but it is by context. The reason you entered is no longer present. This kind of flexibility is what separates those who trade the idea from those who get stuck in the position. --- Getting stopped doesn’t always mean you were wrong. But staying in a trade that’s no longer valid usually does.

I’m done with NFTs. 💢 Most of Matt Furie’s collections are now worthless. There’s no effort to fix it, no accountability, no handoff to the community—nothing. CHAIN/SAW let this happen. I’ve seen plenty of scams in crypto, but I’ve never seen a project abandon its supporters this badly, without even pretending to care. Thousands of regular civilians got burned—many for the first time—and they deserve better. I met several amazing artists while collecting that I still consider good, but watching this collapse hurts. It’s like learning your hero was fake all along. The deeper the trust, the deeper the betrayal. We just want the art we paid for—while they try to run off with the money. 😒

Once people realize the “trenches” and memescope are a solved game we will return to the norm. Beginning to see the tides turning now and holders being rewarded. Why PvP with 400 others that have 20 multiwallets each and are trying to get out within 5 minutes when you can buy, hold and win Maybe Murad was right

the best memecoins are the ones in which the goal / narrative becomes more “realistic” or “makes more sense” the higher the price goes

Hold times have been getting shorter. In late 2024, median hold time in the trenches was 200-300 seconds. Today we're close to 60 seconds.