今天這一點比以往任何時候都更加真實。 Ethena PTs 現在的固定年利率高達 10%-15%,甚至比超低評級的 CCC 債券提供的約 12% 還要好。 如果你能忍受仍然依賴疫情前幻想的低評級郵輪公司,或者租戶是僵屍初創公司和鬼廚房的低評級房地產投資信託,那麼 Ethena PTs(超過 60 億美元的贖回毫無問題)肯定值得你關注。 據估計,有 2000 億到 3000 億美元的資金停留在 CCC 評級或更低的債券中。這 2000 億到 3000 億美元的資金如果能將目光轉向 @pendle_fi,將能享受更好的風險調整回報。 在一個完全理性的世界中,Pendle 現在應該至少擁有 1000 億美元的總鎖倉價值。 醒醒吧,傻瓜。
Pendle Intern
Pendle Intern2025年7月4日
Ethena PTs are serving up 7.5%–8.5% Fixed APY. To put that into TradFi terms, that’s right between bond yields with a B rating (~6.8%) and CCC rating (~12%): B-rated bonds: Speculative, non-investment grade, high credit risk. CCC-rated bonds: Basically junk. Poor quality, default risk very real. Now compare that to Ethena PTs. Instead of relying on “hehe IOU” paper contracts issued by shaky corporations, Ethena PTs are permissionless and enforced by smart contracts. No counterparty risk, no fine print tricks. Yes, DeFi has its own risks - smart contract bugs, depegs... But are they really worse than betting on junk bonds issued by a dying mall chain or overleveraged real estate play? Since launch, over $6.2 BILLION of Ethena TVL has matured, and every single PT has been redeemed without issue. Ethena assets are undergoing battle-tests on a daily basis, especially in these volatile times and are still bravely trudging on, with not a hiccup in sight 🤞 The point is, this is why whales and institutions are circling around PTs: on a risk-adjusted basis, they’re some of the most attractive yield instruments available, onchain or off. If TradFi is still willing to bet on some poor soul issuing debt at CCC just to make payroll next month, then surely it’s time they take a closer look at DeFi’s top-tier bluechips. Pendle works. And that’s why we’re working tirelessly to make “TradFi Citadel” a reality. Because when you show institutions that yield doesn’t have to come from a sinking ship, but from a self-executing vault built on code—they’ll start to see PTs not as a gamble, but as a new standard. It’s not junk. It’s yield, redefined.
14.62K